Generate Quote-Ready Leads for Your Photometric Testing Lab

DLC-savvy content that ranks, converts, and keeps your sphere busy—not blogging.

Manufacturers lose utility rebates when DLC applications fail. We spotlight your LM-79 expertise so lighting engineers find—and trust—your photometric data first.

3 Days vs 30 Days

First draft in 3–4 business days. Win projects while others write proposals.

DLC Application Authority

Rank for "DLC testing requirements" and convert rebate seekers into regular clients.

Rebate-Driven Revenue

Like the lab that landed 5 DLC projects from one efficacy guide.

Best Practices for Generate Quote-Ready Leads for Your Photometric Testing Lab Labs

Target DLC QPL Searches First

Create guides for specific product categories (troffers, high-bays) to catch rebate-hunting manufacturers.

Decode Efficacy Requirements

Show lm/W thresholds by category—manufacturers calculate ROI before they even call.

Offer LM-79 vs LM-80 Clarity

Simple comparison charts prove you understand both photometry and lumen maintenance.

Feature LUNA Dark Sky Specs

Early adopters searching "BUG ratings" and "3000K limits" find your forward-thinking lab.

Bundle Testing + Application

One-stop DLC submission service captures busy manufacturers who value convenience.

FAQs

We're already DLC-approved — why need content?
Being on the list isn't marketing. Engineers search "failed DLC photometry" not "approved labs." Be findable at panic moment.
How fast will content fill our testing schedule?
Most labs book first DLC project within 4-8 weeks. One manufacturer can mean 20+ SKUs tested annually.
Won't sharing DLC tips help competitors?
Share requirements (public info), protect your gonio setup tricks and fast-track process.
Our tech writes test reports, not blogs. How?
One LM-79 walkthrough video = 3 months of content. They demonstrate, we document.
We only run ~80 tests yearly — is content worth it?
Yes. One fixture family can be 10+ variations. Content brings manufacturers, not one-offs.