What you’ll get

This page is a Part 15 landing-page template that ships fast: shortest intro to satisfy intent, clear differentiation, best-practice “failure modes” to prove expertise, and non-obvious FAQs that remove scope risk.

• Differentiation blocks that make your lab the safe choice.
• Failure-mode guidance that prevents retests and schedule slips.
• Buyer-intelligent FAQs and a direct path to scope and convert.

---

What is FCC Part 15 for Manufacturers

Part 15 is the rule set that lets unlicensed RF products ship without harming nearby devices. For manufacturers, it is less about legal text and more about schedule risk, variant creep, and configuration control. Use this section to mirror those pains and show how your lab reduces uncertainty.

Manufacturer pain	What Part 15 actually cares about	What your page should promise
Late radio integration and launch deadlines	Power, bandwidth, band-edge, spurious, plus Subpart B emissions from digital boards	Engineer-ready test plan with worst-case modes; clear queue dates; pre-scan path to reduce rework
Antenna swap or cable changes after EVT	Configuration changes can invalidate earlier data or alter EIRP and margins	Policy on antenna families and retest thresholds; fixture guidance; change-control checklist
Variant sprawl across SKUs and markets	Family grouping must still demonstrate worst-case channels, bands, and I/O sets	Family matrix showing which data covers which SKUs; label and manual review included
Unclear firmware for testing	Continuous transmit, channel control, and duty settings are required to prove limits	Exact firmware requirements; sample count and instrumentation unit policy; turnaround tied to readiness
DFS or complex procedures (U-NII)	Radar detection timing and power control behavior must meet Subpart E procedure	DFS pre-screen, required scripts, and scheduling windows clearly stated
Retest loops that blow the launch date	Margins near limits and uncontrolled test setups drive repeats	Risk-first pre-compliance scan, worst-case cabling list, and mitigation notes captured for design

Where Part 15 fits in a global program

Most teams ship in multiple regions. Map the Part 15 scope to international equivalents so buyers see reuse opportunities and retest gaps up front.

Device scenario	Likely Part 15 clauses	International equivalents you can also test	Guidance to show on page
BLE or 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi module in host	§15.247 (power, bandwidth, band-edge) + §15.107/109 for host emissions	EU RED EN 300 328; Canada RSS-247; UKCA; Japan Radio Act; Taiwan NCC	Module vs end-product strategy; reuse of plots; when host retest is still required
5 GHz or 6 GHz Wi-Fi with DFS/TPC	§15.407 including DFS and power control	EN 301 893; RSS-247; Korea KC; Australia RCM	DFS pre-checks, radar waveforms, and extra chamber time expectations
IT equipment without radios	§15.107/109 Subpart B (conducted and radiated emissions)	CISPR 32 / EN 55032; ICES-003; VCCI; KN 32	Cable and I/O worst case plan; mains supply choices; Class A vs Class B disclosure
LED drivers and lighting controls	Subpart B emissions; supply harmonics as applicable	CISPR 15 (lighting) where applicable; EN 55032 for digital control gear	Representative fixtures and cabling; dimming modes and PWM behavior

---

When to Split Pages and Change Content Structure

Split pages when the split matches how buyers search and how global programs are scoped. Keep one Part 15 hub for broad discovery, then add subpages where clause-level or technology terms convert better and where international equivalents help buyers plan multi-region entries.

Scenario	Recommended page(s)	Why split here	International crosswalks to include	Primary next step
Broad discovery for “fcc part 15 testing”	Part 15 hub	Catch-all traffic, fast scoping, anchor links to key sections	EU RED overview, Canada ISED, UKCA, Australia RCM, Japan Radio Act, Korea KC, Taiwan NCC	RFQ block and links to Subpart B, C, E as needed
Clause and limit searches for unintentional radiators	Subpart B page	Searchers use “Class B,” “§15.107,” “§15.109” and expect emissions focus	CISPR 32 or EN 55032 emissions, EN 55035 immunity, Canada ICES-003, VCCI, KN 32 and KN 35	Methods table, cable worst case plan, RFQ
2.4 GHz radios and low-power transmitters	Subpart C page	Technology terms dominate: “15.247,” “BLE power,” “band-edge”	EN 300 328, RSS-247, Japan Radio Act low-power categories, Taiwan NCC	Power, bandwidth, spurious, band-edge sections and RFQ
5 GHz or 6 GHz Wi-Fi with DFS or TPC	Subpart E page	Buyers search “15.407,” “DFS testing,” scheduling is unique	EN 301 893, RSS-247 regional notes, Korea KC DFS specifics, Australia RCM	DFS pre-checks, required scripts, booking widget
Multi-region go-to-market and reuse planning	International Equivalents page, linked from hub and subparts	One place to show reuse opportunities and retest gaps	Side-by-side mapping for RED, ISED, UKCA, RCM, Japan, Korea, Taiwan	Upload country list and variant matrix for scoping
Early risk screens and design guidance	Keep on hub with a “Pre-compliance scans” anchor	Avoid thin duplication, keep velocity high	Note how pre-scan data can inform RED or ISED later	Contact to schedule scan and mitigation review

URL and heading patterns

Page type	URL pattern	H1 pattern	Key H2 anchors	Canonical
Hub	/standards/fcc-part-15	FCC Part 15 Compliance Testing	Requirements, Methods, International Equivalents, FAQs	Self
Subpart B	/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-b	FCC Part 15 Subpart B Testing	Conducted Emissions, Radiated Emissions, Cables and I/O	Self
Subpart C	/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-c	FCC Part 15 Subpart C Testing	Power, Bandwidth, Band-edge, Spurious	Self
Subpart E	/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-e	FCC Part 15 Subpart E Testing	DFS, TPC, EIRP, Band-edge	Self
International equivalents	/standards/international-equivalents	International EMC and Radio Equivalents	FCC ↔ RED, ISED, UKCA, RCM, APAC	Self

---

Wireframe: FCC Part 15 Standards Page Anatomy

In one glance: what this page does

You’re here to ship an RF product under FCC Part 15 without slipping your launch. This page scopes the exact clauses you’ll face, shows how we reduce retest loops, and maps data reuse for RED/ISED/UKCA so multi-region programs stay on schedule.

---

Why teams choose this lab for Part 15

Accredited, clause-clear scope

ISO/IEC 17025 scope covers Subpart B, C, and E. We confirm device eligibility and worst-case modes up front.

Global crosswalk, less retest

Side-by-side FCC ↔ RED/EN, ISED, UKCA, RCM mapping so plots carry across markets where allowed.

Automation & evidence

Scripted test sequences, repeatable setups, and sharable artifacts (plots, margins, uncertainties) for quick reviews.

OTA & antenna competence

TRP/TIS and pattern insight to catch range and band-edge issues before they become schedule problems.

Coexistence & DFS realism

Practical interference and radar-emulation checks so Subpart E doesn’t derail timelines.

Report velocity

Drafts in days, with change logs that make regulatory files and internal approvals painless.

---

Best practices, framed as failure modes

Prevent the issues that force retests or confuse buyers by addressing them in the page itself.

Failure mode	What to show on the page	Why it converts
“Module reuse covers everything”	Explicit note that hosts still require Subpart B emissions; simple matrix: when module data is sufficient vs. when host retest is required.	Eliminates surprise retests; sets credible scope early.
Antenna or cable changes after EVT	Policy for antenna families, cable sets, and retest thresholds; request final antenna PNs in the RFQ.	Reduces invalidated data and timeline slips.
No engineering firmware	Firmware checklist (continuous TX, channel control, duty cycle); link an upload step in the micro-form.	Improves first-pass yield and speeds setup.
Variant sprawl with unclear coverage	Family matrix template (SKUs, antennas, bands, I/O sets) with “covered by” notes for reuse.	Lets buyers plan SKUs without over-testing.
DFS scheduling surprises	Subpart E callout with required scripts, radar waveforms, and booking windows.	Protects critical path for 5/6 GHz launches.
Cable/IO worst case omitted	Table of representative cable sets and I/O combinations; ask for photos/drawings with lengths.	Avoids late failures from harness changes.
PDF-only “scope sheet”	Keep HTML as primary (methods, inputs, lead-time table); serve downloadable PDFs with X-Robots-Tag: noindex.	Ranks better and answers questions in-page.
International retest surprises	FCC ↔ RED/ISED/UKCA/RCM crosswalk with a “reuse vs. retest” note per test type.	Sets global expectations; reduces scope churn.

---

Non-obvious FAQs your page should answer

Can we reuse EU RED plots for Part 15?

Sometimes. Spell out which measurements map cleanly (e.g., certain emissions and spurious tests) and which don’t (U.S.-specific procedures, detector settings, band-edge rules). Invite teams to attach existing plots for a reuse check.

Why do radiated results shift between labs?

Site geometry, cables, and mode control. Publish your setup discipline (distances, detectors, uncertainties) and show how you pick worst-case modes so margins transfer.

What speeds up DFS approvals?

Pre-screens with agreed waveforms, scripts that expose timing, and early booking for shared resources. Add a short checklist to your RFQ.

Does a certified module exempt the host?

No. Hosts still need Subpart B emissions and integration checks. Clarify when labeling/manual updates are enough vs. when host testing is required.

How do we keep variants from blowing up scope?

Use a family matrix: antennas, bands, I/O, power classes. Identify the worst-case SKU and what data covers each variant across regions.

---

Ready to scope your Part 15 program?

Upload your variant matrix, antenna list, firmware notes, and target regions. We’ll return a clause-by-clause plan with timelines and reuse opportunities.

Request a Part 15 test planor upload your package for a 24-point readiness review.

---

---

Keywords, Headings and How to Avoid Cannibalization

Give each page a single primary query family and predictable anchors so Google and buyers know where to land. The hub uses your new wireframe sections.

URL	H1 pattern	Allowed H2 anchors	Primary KW	Secondary KWs	Do not target / Notes
/standards/fcc-part-15	FCC Part 15 Compliance Testing	Why Us; Best Practices (Failure Modes); Non-Obvious FAQs; Convert; International Equivalents (optional)	fcc part 15 testing	part 15 compliance; part 15 requirements; pre-compliance part 15	Avoid clause terms like “§15.247/§15.407” here; link to subpages.
/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-b	FCC Part 15 Subpart B Testing	Conducted Emissions; Radiated Emissions; Cables & I/O; Class A vs Class B; RFQ	part 15 subpart b	class b radiated limits; §15.107; §15.109; emissions testing it equipment	Don’t target the head term “part 15 testing”.
/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-c	FCC Part 15 Subpart C Testing	Power; Bandwidth; Band-edge; Spurious; Module vs Host; RFQ	§15.247 testing	ble testing; 2.4 ghz spread spectrum; intentional radiator testing	Don’t target “dfs testing” here (that’s Subpart E).
/standards/fcc-part-15/subpart-e	FCC Part 15 Subpart E Testing	DFS; TPC; EIRP; Band-edge; Spurious; RFQ	§15.407 testing	dfs testing; unii testing; 5 ghz/6 ghz wi-fi certification	Don’t target “§15.247” here (hand off to Subpart C).
/standards/international-equivalents	International EMC and Radio Equivalents	FCC ↔ RED; FCC ↔ ISED; UKCA; RCM; APAC; Reuse vs Retest	fcc vs ce	part 15 vs red; canada rss-247 vs §15.247	Keep comparisons here; no long methods tables.
/services/emc	EMC Testing Services	Standards We Test; Facilities; Scheduling; RFQ	emc testing services	emissions testing; immunity testing; compliance lab	One text link to the Part 15 hub (“Part 15 testing”).
/industries/iot	EMC and RF Testing for IoT	Common Radios; Antennas; Variant Strategy; RFQ	iot emc testing	wifi testing; ble testing; fcc testing for iot	No clause keywords; hand off to Subpart C/E.

Anchor IDs to earn sitelinks

• Hub: #why-us, #failure-modes, #faqs-smart, #convert, #international (optional)
• Subpart B: #conducted, #radiated, #cables-io, #rfq
• Subpart C/E: #power, #bandwidth, #band-edge, #spurious, #dfs, #rfq

Internal link guardrails

• From Services → one text link to the Part 15 hub (“Part 15 testing”).
• From hub → one link per subpart using clause phrases as anchor text.
• From subparts → link to International Equivalents using “FCC vs CE/RED” anchors.

---

---

Request a Part 15 test planor upload your package for a readiness review.

---

Technical SEO Guidelines for Part 15 Standards Pages

Build the page so it ranks for the right intent and converts. Keep HTML as the primary asset, make subpages self-canonical, and track the actions that predict RFQs.

Issue	Solution	Implementation	QA
PDF outranks or replaces the page	Keep HTML primary. Allow downloads but prevent indexing of reports and forms.	Add X-Robots-Tag: noindex, noarchive to /*.pdf via headers. Link PDFs from the HTML page. Provide an HTML table for methods and a short report snapshot.	PDF is fetchable but not indexed. HTML URL earns impressions and clicks.
Cannibalization across hub and subparts	One intent per URL. Each page is self-canonical.	Hub targets “fcc part 15 testing.” Subpart B targets Class A/B emissions. Subpart C targets §15.247. Subpart E targets §15.407. Use descriptive internal anchors and link text.	Search Console queries split cleanly by URL. No duplicate titles.
Thin or missing schema	Add Organization, Service, FAQPage, and BreadcrumbList.	Place JSON-LD in layout or page head. Use the FAQ only on the hub or a single subpage with the actual FAQ content visible.	Rich-results test passes. No warnings on required fields.
Slow plots and oversized diagrams	Ship responsive images and defer anything heavy.	Provide width and height. Use loading=“lazy”. Prefer compressed SVG for icons and WebP/AVIF for photos. Inline small badges.	LCP and CLS within budget on mobile. No layout shifts from images.
Unclear crawl and link map	Make anchors and internal routes predictable.	Anchors on hub: #why-us, #failure-modes, #faqs-smart, #convert (+ #international if present). Place one text link from Services → hub; hub → each subpart; subparts ↔ International Equivalents. Use descriptive link text.	Sitelinks appear. Crawl path surfaces all key sections.
Untracked conversion behaviors	Instrument RFQ predictors, not just form submit.	Track clicks on “Request a quote,” file uploads, anchor jumps to #requirements, and time on Methods. Use one GA4 event name per action.	You can attribute RFQs to pages and sections, not just sessions.

Schema starter (place in layout or this page)

Headers example for PDFs (add to your hosting config)

# Netlify or Cloudflare-style headers
# Disallow indexing for any PDF artifacts
/*.pdf
X-Robots-Tag: noindex, noarchive

---

Common Mistakes to Avoid

These patterns cost rankings and RFQs. Use the right-hand column as your remediation plan.

Don’t	Do instead
Publish only a PDF report or scope sheet	Publish an HTML page with methods and inputs tables. Offer the PDF as a download with X-Robots-Tag noindex.
Mix multiple standards on the same URL	Keep one intent per page. Create an International Equivalents page for cross-mapping.
Duplicate hub copy on subpart pages	Tailor each subpage to its clause set and queries. Self-canonical on every page.
Hide the readiness list behind forms	Show the checklist inline. Ask only for inputs that improve scoping on the RFQ form.
Skip schema or use FAQ without visible content	Add Organization, Service, Breadcrumbs. Use FAQ only where the questions and answers appear on the page.
Heavy, unoptimized plots that shift layout	Provide width and height, lazy-load, and compress. Prefer WebP/AVIF for photos and SVG for icons.
Generic anchors and weak internal links	Use predictable anchors like #methods and link with descriptive text, for example “Part 15 Subpart C testing.”
No conversion instrumentation	Track RFQ clicks, file uploads, anchor jumps to Requirements, and time on Methods as GA4 events.

Pre-publish check

• Titles and H1s are unique across hub and subparts.
• Sitemap includes hub, subparts, and International Equivalents. PDFs are excluded.
• All badges and diagrams have alt text. No layout shifts on mobile.

---

FAQs Your Landing Page Must Answer

Merge essential buyer questions with the smart, non-obvious ones so there’s only one FAQ block on the page.

---

Final Checklist and Next Steps

Before you publish, confirm the page can rank and convert. Then give buyers a direct path to scope their program.

• ☑ Hub and subpart pages are live, self-canonical, and interlinked.
• ☑ Methods table and readiness checklist are visible in HTML, not only in PDFs.
• ☑ International Equivalents section maps FCC to RED, ISED, UKCA, RCM, and APAC.
• ☑ GA4 events track RFQ clicks, file uploads, and jumps to Requirements and Methods.
• ☑ PDFs return X-Robots-Tag: noindex. Images have width and height and lazy-load.
• ☑ Anchors are predictable: #why-us, #failure-modes, #faqs-smart, #convert (+ #international if used).

Request a Part 15 test page quoteor upload your package for a readiness review.