Nadcap-Ready NDT Website Checklist + Standards Page Template
Launch a clean NDT site fast: the exact pages, proofs, and RFQ basics Nadcap-minded buyers expect—without burying evidence in PDFs.
What you’ll get
Here’s a copy-paste checklist and a standards page wireframe so you can launch quickly and avoid common misses.
- What ships: services/method pages, standards index + approvals, RFQ with turnaround.
- How it looks: grouped checklist you can scan in one screen, minimal styling.
- Who it’s for: NDT teams aiming for Nadcap/17025-friendly web proof without bloat.
Website checklist (what to launch first)
What you’ll get: A single-screen, grouped checklist covering core pages, proof, conversion, and measurement.
Core pages
| Item | Must-have | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Services hub | Lists UT, RT, MT, PT, ET with brief scopes and next clicks. | One sentence per method; link to child pages. |
| Method pages | Dedicated pages for UT/RT/MT/PT/ET; advanced UT children: PAUT, TOFD. | Put standard IDs in H2s where relevant (e.g., E213, E1444, E1417). |
| Mobile / On-site | Regional service-area page(s) with dispatch line and coverage map. | Avoid doorway clones; show rig/equipment photos. |
| Industries | Aerospace, Energy, Fabrication, Castings/Forgings, Weld QA—each with typical standards. | Use acceptance-criteria snippets; link to RFQ. |
Standards & approvals
| Item | Must-have | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Standards index | HTML index for key practices: E1417, E1444, E213, etc. | Each entry links to method page + redacted report. |
| Approvals | Nadcap (AC7114) and ISO/IEC 17025 (if applicable) with scope text. | Badges in header trust strip → Certificates page. |
| Personnel quals | NAS 410 / SNT-TC-1A/CP-189 levels with month/year expiries. | Name Responsible Level III on aerospace pages. |
RFQ & conversion
| Item | Must-have | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ page | 7–9 fields: contact, company, methods, part context, standard, timeline, location, uploads, consent. | On-site toggle routes to dispatch; show turnaround ranges. |
| Microcopy | Short confidentiality promise; file-type/size guidance. | Reduce back-and-forth; fewer stalled quotes. |
| Thank-you | Confirms owner + ETA; links to matching case study. | Optionally include a calendar link. |
Proof & resources
| Item | Must-have | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Certificates page | Current PDFs with issue/expiry + scope in plain text. | No dead-end: link back to deciding method + RFQ. |
| Sample reports | Redacted PDF + key page screenshot with teaching caption. | Caption explains why it proves compliance. |
| Turnaround times | By method; rush policy stated. | Pre-qualifies urgent prospects. |
Analytics & basics
| Item | Must-have | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking | RFQ events (view, start, submit), phone click tracking per region. | Group pages: Methods, Industries, Proof, RFQ. |
| Schema | Organization, Service, FAQPage, BreadcrumbList. | Keep it minimal and accurate. |
| PDF handling | Host PDFs; canonical to HTML page; link both ways. | Avoid PDF-only ranking; keep auditors happy. |
| Accessibility | Table markup, alt text on proof images, readable contrast. | Passes quick checks; helps procurement on mobile. |
Do this → you get X: Launch the essentials in order, with proof in view → faster approvals and more clean RFQs.
Standards Page Wireframe (ASTM E1417 Example)
What you’ll get: A plug-in page skeleton that makes a buyer say “Yes, they run the right process” without opening a PDF.
Page goal (first line)
Show that you run ASTM E1417 correctly—and make it easy to request a quote.
Wireframe blocks (H4s you can copy)
Hero: ASTM E1417 Penetrant Inspection
Say what you do in plain English.
- One-line explainer: Fluorescent penetrant, Level 2 sensitivity for aluminum/steel parts.
- Proof strip: Nadcap badge → Certificates page; Level III name (contact); typical turnaround.
Eligibility & Scope
Help buyers self-qualify in 15 seconds.
- Materials: aluminum, steel, titanium (finish limits).
- Part size & geometry notes; surface prep needed (clean, dry).
- Common use cases: welds, castings, machined surfaces.
What It Finds & Where It’s Used
Set expectations on defects and applications.
- Finds: surface-breaking cracks, laps, porosity.
- Typical programs: aerospace hardware, pressure vessels, automotive safety parts.
Sample & Setup Requirements
Prevent rework with a short checklist.
- Quantity/lots, surface condition, NDT Level, acceptance criteria.
- Upload ask: drawings (PDF/DWG), prior nonconformance notes.
- Safety/handling: fluids, cleanliness, temperature.
Evidence & Process Controls
Show the standard in view, not buried.
- Callouts: ASTM E1417/E1417M, lighting levels, developer type, wash parameters.
- Photo/caption: “Developer dwell timed per spec; indicator lights verified.”
- Link: Redacted sample report (screenshotted key page).
Mini-FAQ (3)
Answer blockers briefly.
- Do you run solvent-removable? — Yes; note if customer requires water-washable.
- Can you inspect anodized parts? — Usually no; we’ll confirm after a quick photo.
- What turnaround can we expect? — PT lots: 2–3 days; rush available.
RFQ Block (sticky or inline)
Make the next step obvious.
- Buttons: Get a coverage check · Request a quote.
- Fields: method pre-selected (PT/E1417), on-site vs ship-to, upload drawings.
Internal Links (slots)
Close loops with helpful routes.
- Methods: MT, UT/PAUT (comparison).
- Proof: Certificates, Personnel Qualifications (NAS 410).
- Resources: Acceptance criteria, Turnaround times.
Block → Content table (copy for your brief)
| Block | What to include |
|---|---|
| Hero | Plain-English H1, one-line scope, trust strip (Nadcap, 17025 if applicable), TAT, RFQ button. |
| Eligibility & Scope | Materials/finishes, size/geometry limits, common uses, quick “not a fit” notes. |
| Finds & Uses | Defects it reveals, typical industries/components, one photo with teaching caption. |
| Sample & Setup | Checklist (qty, level, acceptance), upload guidance (PDF/DWG), cleanliness note. |
| Evidence & Controls | Spec ID in text (E1417/E1417M), key controls (lighting, developer), redacted report link. |
| Mini-FAQ | Three blockers (process variant, material/finish, timing) with 2-sentence answers. |
| RFQ Block | Method pre-selected, on-site toggle, upload fields, confidentiality note. |
| Internal Links | Methods → Proof → RFQ path; no cul-de-sacs. |
Caption rule: the image shows what; the caption tells why it proves compliance (e.g., “UV intensity verified at part—meets E1417 threshold”).
Common Mistakes to Avoid
What you’ll get: A quick “don’t ship this” list that keeps your standards pages clean and conversion-ready.
| Don’t | Do instead | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| PDF-only scope pages | Publish HTML pages with the spec ID in H1/H2 and link the PDF for auditors. | Buyers skim on mobile; HTML wins rankings and trust at a glance. |
| Mix multiple practices on one URL | Create one URL per practice (e.g., E1417 separate from E1444) and cross-link. | Clear intent helps searchers and avoids procurement confusion. |
| No CTA or upload guidance | Add an RFQ block with on-site toggle and file types/limits. | Reduces email ping-pong and speeds quoting. |
| Walls of text | Use short blocks, H4s from the wireframe, and one teaching caption per image. | Passes the scroll test; keeps engineers engaged. |
| Proof cul-de-sacs (certs/reports with no links) | From every proof, link back to the deciding method page and the RFQ. | Keeps readers on a path to a quote. |
| Generic “we do PT” copy | Show controls in view: lighting levels, developer type, wash parameters. | Signals real process control, not marketing fluff. |
| Unclear acceptance criteria | State the customer spec or default criteria and link examples. | Prevents rework and quote delays. |
| Doorway city clones | Use regional service-area pages with dispatch details and photos. | Converts local on-site demand without spam. |
Implementation notes
What you’ll get: Quick fixes for linking, schema, PDFs, and accessibility—so your standards pages rank and convert cleanly.
Issue → Solution (ship these)
-
Issue: Internal links feel random.
Solution: Enforce 1 up, 2 sideways, 1 down + breadcrumbs that mirror IA (Home > Methods > PT > E1417).
Payoff: Readers always have a next click to RFQ; crawl paths stay tidy. -
Issue: Either no schema or walls of JSON-LD.
Solution: Add minimal, accurate schema to key pages.
Payoff: Richer snippets without validation noise. -
Issue: PDFs outrank your HTML (or create duplicates).
Solution: Put full content on HTML pages, link the PDF, and set rel=canonical from the PDF to the HTML.
Payoff: Auditors still get PDFs; buyers land on pages that convert. -
Issue: Proof images don’t teach or fail accessibility checks.
Solution: Add alt text and a teaching caption (why it proves compliance). Use proper table markup for acceptance criteria.
Payoff: Pass the scroll test and mobile procurement checks. -
Issue: Dispatch and RFQ events aren’t traceable.
Solution: Track RFQ view/start/submit + per-region phone clicks; group reports by Methods / Industries / Proof / RFQ.
Payoff: See where quotes originate and tune top paths first.
Code-label callouts (names only):
- Schema:
Organization,Service,FAQPage,BreadcrumbList - Events:
rfq_view,rfq_start,rfq_submit,phone_click_region - Links:
rel="canonical"(PDF → HTML),rel="noopener"for external - Media:
alt,<figure> + <figcaption>, semantic<table>
A Brief FAQ
Which standards should we publish first?
Prioritize what buyers search + what you can prove today: typically E1417 (PT), E1444 (MT), E213/E273 (UT). Link each to a redacted sample report.
Can we reuse audit photos on the site?
Yes—non-sensitive images only. Add a caption that explains compliance (e.g., “UV intensity verified at part”). Redact badges/IDs if needed.
How many sample requirements should we list?
Keep a short checklist (qty/lots, level, acceptance criteria, finish, access constraints) and point to the RFQ upload for the rest.
Start Your Nadcap-Ready Website Sprint
Install the checklist + standards template and ship the essentials in 10 days—proof in view, RFQ that converts. Want help? We’re here to get you building quickly.
Ready to generate quote-ready leads for your lab?
Let's discuss how technical content can bring qualified engineers to your testing services.